Case Study: Laurie Graves and Lamont Clabaugh
Common Core Connection
Many teachers fear large projects due to the need to stay on sequence and cover required standards. Those teachers who take the plunge, however, often find they are able to cover more requirements and do so in a way that addresses students passions.
Teacher Laurie Graves reflected on this project, “I think because this was student-driven, their interest drove the project and their passion. The writing that has come out of this, and the (math activities) they have done on this project; we’ve seen a higher level of expertise in these areas. If it is about the kids’ interests, they’ll perform better, and we’ve certainly seen that with this project.”
Projects like Laurie’s provide natural opportunities for the rigor demanded by the Common Core. Because the issue of recycling was concretely rooted in their personal and school-lives, opportunities for reading and writing across many subject areas were abundant. As students sought to understand these problems, they analyzed informational text and summarized their findings in writing, speech, and mathematically. As a result, Laurie was able to address an impressive range of Common Core ELA standards, math standards, and her state science and social studies content standards- all while giving her students the opportunity to make a real impact in their school and community.
English Language Arts
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.1 Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.10 Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.8 Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.W.10 Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.1 Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
-
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.SL.2 Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally.
Mathematics Practice Standards
-
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
-
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP3 Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
-
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP4 Model with mathematics.
-
CCSS.Math.Practice.MP5 Use appropriate tools strategically.
3rd Grade Specific Math Content Standards | This small sampling demonstrates the specific math content connected to the Mathematical Practice Standards.
-
CCSS.Math.Content.3.NBT.A.1 Use place value understanding to round whole numbers to the nearest 10 or 100.
-
CCSS.Math.Content.3.NBT.A.3 Multiply one-digit whole numbers by multiples of 10 in the range 10–90 (e.g., 9 × 80, 5 × 60) using strategies based on place value and properties of operations. (For example, through analyzing a survey’s tallied data.)
-
CCSS.Math.Content.3.MD.B.3 Draw a scaled picture graph and a scaled bar graph to represent a data set with several categories.
PROCESS STEPS
WEEK 1 | Phase- Make it Real: Brainstorm.
Goal: Define a problem in the community | Activity: Group Brainstorm
In small groups, students brainstormed ideas that would make a positive impact on the county. As they came back together as a whole group, they shared their wide range of ideas: ruling out impossible ones, narrowing down to a specific idea that the class could take on, then identifying one with strong student support: recycling.
After choosing the issue of the community’s recycling habits, students were challenged to determine whether there was a recycling problem, and if so, what was the need in the community. Students began by visiting the county recycling website and reviewing a professional survey on the county’s recycling habits. Students used the results of this research study to determine what the needs might be and to start a discussion on how improved recycling could help their local environment.
Laurie reflected on the brainstorming process:
“We gave the students no limits on this first round of thinking and sharing. Some of the ideas were awesome and out there, like a pulley system between Sheridan and Big Horn so that we didn’t need cars, we would just be pulled along!! It was great!”
WEEK 2 | Phase- Make it Real: Investigate and Define.
Goal: Determine need at the most local level: the school campus.
Activity: Create a recycling habits survey to distribute to the students and teachers.
To further this research, the students decided to create a survey focused on recycling. During the survey building stage students recognized the importance of convenience, and were most concerned that the general public did not have any idea of where recycling bins were located in the county. Several felt that a county map should be constructed that reflected this information. Students conducted their survey, including questions about the county recycling bins, throughout the elementary and middle schools, questioning students and adults. They then translated this data to a tally graph. After sorting through the questions, students worked in pairs preparing bar and circle graphs on excel to determine if there was a need for recycling on the Big Horn campus.
Student survey and the tallied results displayed in the school hallway. |
WEEK 3 | Phase- Make it Relevant: Field Research
Goal: Conduct hands-on research in the community using a variety of methods.
Activity: Conduct a community trash pickup, then analyze the results to determine recycling needs.
Activity: Create trash art using collected trash items.
The next step was to get out into the field. Students began the week by embarking on a city-wide trash pick. The goal was not just to clean up the trash, but to use each piece as evidence of a larger problem, and data points for analysis. After collecting the trash, students separated it by recyclable categories: paper, plastic, aluminum, and others (clothing was a commonly found item). They counted each piece then created graphs to represent their findings: plastic was the most common trash item. Students created a piece of trash art in the shape of a ram’s head, then displayed it in the school hallway to inform people about the amount of recyclable trash they found in the community.
Trash pick-up in downtown Big Horn, WY. |
Sorting trash into categories. In the background you can see a PollEverywhere exhibiting student predictions about which type of trash they’d find the most of. |
A trash collage of the school's mascot, the Big Horn Ram. |
Watch a stop-motion animation of the making of the Trash Ram. |
Week 4 | Phase- Make it Relevant: Field Research; Initial Planning Phase
Goal: Conduct hands-on research in the community, analyze the results in order to develop an action-plan.
Next, students visited their local recycling facility to learn more about the process and talk to the most important experts on their topic: waste management employees. Students asked them for tips on how they might implement a recycling program in their school. What would they need to keep in mind? How might they do it?
Laurie Reflected:
“On Wednesday, students traveled to the local landfill and then on to the recycling center. Stating that their mouths were agape would be an understatement! They are still retelling facts that they picked up on that tour. They were empowered to be told that recycling bins could be placed on campus and would be emptied by the recycling crew. This led to their current project of interviewing the principals and custodian to get permission.”
Students visit the Sheridan County Recycling Center and Landfill. |
WEEK 5 | Phase- Make it Relevant: Planning
Goal: Develop a plan
Activity: Propose a school-wide recycling program to key stakeholders, then advocate with with larger school community.
Students developed interview questions in order to determine the logistics of implementing a school recycling program (Interview questions: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwHq5f-UK6LaM1JtSUgtUE9PVXM/edit)
They then interviewed Principals at the Elementary and High School to see if a recycling program at their school would be possible. Students organized to create recycling bins out of cardboard boxes. In the spirit of reusing materials, they painted them with leftover house paint from their homes. They also came up with a schedule/plan for emptying the classroom bins into the recycling container.
WEEK 6 | Phase- Make an Impact:
Goal: Implement the plan
In order to inform and engage the rest of the school community, students designed posters to advertise the recycling initiative and posted them around the elementary, middle school, and high school campus. Then, students created a system to support school-wide recycling. In the spirit of reusing materials, they painted boxes that they dug out of the school’s cardboard trailer and brought in unfinished cans of paint from home to paint the boxes. The boxes were distributed to classrooms across the Big Horn campus, and students began the process of collecting recyclables, working with the custodial staff and classroom teachers to ensure successful implementation.
Video of Student Implementation by local newspaper The Sheridan Press. |
Newspaper Article about project implementation: http://www.modelclassroom.org/Thesheridanpress.com_ModelClassroom.pdf
Outcomes
Aside from meeting a wide range of Common Core and local standards, this project had a real impact on the participating students and the surrounding community.
Impact on Students
-
Emotional intelligences | In order to be successful in this process, student had to think beyond their own personal needs to consider the needs of the larger community and the local environment.
-
Ability to Collaborate Effectively | Collaboration went well beyond the classroom and included working with peers, students across all grade levels, adults, and a variety of local experts.
Impact on community
-
Recycling Campaign | Informed the school community about importance of recycling and developed systems to improve recycling options. Students also reported increased recycling and reusing of materials at home.
-
School Wide Recycling Program | Implemented a school-wide recycling program that involved all students, other teachers, school principals, school custodians, and the county recycling center.
Three weeks into the Recycling Program, Laurie shared:
“They are moving into their third week of collecting paper and plastic from all of these classrooms. It is quite a process and they have a system down. They borrow a “tipsy” dumpster from the custodial staff in each of the buildings and have emailed all of the participating teachers (most of the staff!!) to set their recycle boxes outside of the classrooms by 3:00 on Thursdays. The students then divide into two groups and with us (the teachers) and a parent or two tagging, the students collect all of the materials and load it into one of our trucks to be taken to a recycling dumpster in town. So far, they have collected about three extra large garbage bags per building. They are hoping to petition the county commissioners next fall to get a recycling dumpster on campus. Paper seems to be the overriding item that is being collected.”
Conclusions
-
What worked well
-
Student-Driven: Making the project student-driven allowed multiple opportunities for students of all skill levels and interests to participate and be part of the process.
-
Ongoing Opportunities for Collaboration & Peer Feedback: Laurie & Lamont felt that having continuous opportunities for students to work in collaborative groups was one of the most beneficial outcomes of our year-long project. They became very adept at collaborating and evaluating each other's work.
-
Student Choice: Offering several different choices in the final product provided structure, but also allowed them to "drive" their learning and have control in the final presentation.
-
Emphasis on Student Action: The recycling project was the end result of a larger year-long project exploring the Then & Now of Sheridan County, Wyoming. Having the students take action by implementing their recycling idea was really key to bringing their study of the then and now of Sheridan County history full circle. They were very invested in making a difference for the now and the future of the county and are fired up about continuing with the recycling efforts next fall.
-
-
Changes for the next Implementation:
-
Allow time for meeting with County Commissioners: Structure the time a bit differently so that students have an opportunity to visit with the county commissioners in order to bring official recycling bins to the school site. In this iteration of the project there was not time, but teachers Laurie and Lamont plan to have their students take this on next fall.
-
Get wider school involvement: Involving other classes in the recycling project would have made this more meaningful to the larger school community. When Laurie and Lamont saw the impact this project had on their students and families, they realized that it would have been an even richer experience if it had impacted the whole school in a personal manner.
-
-
Tips for other teachers trying this project
-
Get support from key stakeholders: Definitely have the support of the administration and the board.
-
Find outside experts to provide support, if possible: Laurie and Lamont collaborated with the Pearson Foundation’s Model Classroom Program, and found this helpful in providing ideas on integrating digital media as well as another perspective to look at the project from a different angle. Teachers trying this project might look to their local school community to see if a media specialist could assist, or might look to the local college or university for collaboration and outside perspectives.
-
Make it intentionally interdisciplinary: Although this project was incredibly interdisciplinary, Laurie and Lamont feel they could have blended the project into the core curriculum areas a bit more and a bit earlier in order to allow for deeper learning and to cover more subject areas.
-
Additional Resources
-
Teachers Laurie Graves & Lamont Clabaugh created a Prezi to track each step of the student-directed process: http://prezi.com/oadqwode8vkg/third-grade-community-project/
-
Student Created Project Rubric: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwHq5f-UK6LaMU4tTnIxejVUNkU/edit
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.